New Pittsburgh Courier

A+ A A-

Articles

We must now do our part

(NNPA)—We have lost two brave and courageous souls in the struggle for civil rights and social justice—Dr. Benjamin Lawson Hooks and Dr. Dorothy Irene Height.

I knew them both very well.  Ben Hooks was a Renaissance man.  He was a minister who pastored two churches for 30 years—one in Memphis and the other in Detroit.  He was a soldier during World War II. He was a lawyer who sat on the board of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and became the head of the NAACP. He was appointed a judge in Memphis, and became the first African-American federal commissioner. Ben Hooks was an extraordinary man.

JohnLewisbox

Last Updated on Monday, 03 December 2012 19:20

Hits: 818

Guest editorial...Comprehensive ­immigration reform can’t wait

by Shannon Williams

The immigration system in this country needs to be fixed.

However, it needs to be repaired in a solid, effective and well-thought-out manner—completely opposite of the careless way Arizona’s Gov. Jan Brewer thinks the issue should be resolved.

For the few who may not have heard about Arizona’s controversy, the short of it is that last week, Brewer signed legislation into law that would allow police officers to determine whether people are in the United States legally if there is reason to suspect otherwise. Supporters of the law say it will control illegal immigration and help with the state’s crime rate, while opponents feel that the law unfairly targets a specific group of people.

I agree with the latter.

The problem with this law is that it promotes racial profiling; something that, unfortunately, Blacks are all too familiar with. While I certainly respect the work of police officers, I question the criteria they would use to “determine” whether a person should verify their immigration status without it being considered racial profiling. A police officer who is patrolling a specific area isn’t going to walk up to a White person and ask them to prove they’re an American, nor is that officer going to randomly ask an Asian to produce a green card. Because of this new law, however, an officer will (and legally can) ask a random Hispanic person to show documentation that validates his or her status.

How can this not be considered wrong?

When I initially heard of SB 1070, I immediately thought of the immense racial profiling so many Blacks are still subjected to day-after-day. As a matter of fact, not long ago, a male friend who lives in Philadelphia told me how he was followed for 20 minutes by a police officer before being pulled over and asked several questions—none of which had anything to do with driving or traffic violations.

You see, my friend works in an urban area of Philadelphia that isn’t necessarily riddled with crime, but it doesn’t have manicured lawns and white picket fences, either. Shortly after he left his office, he noticed a patrol car behind him. Thinking little of it and having nothing to hide, he continued on his journey. As he left the part of town where his office is located, and continued to drive towards the other side of town where he lives, my friend happened to look in his rearview mirror and saw the same patrol car and officer behind him.

That’s when he began to understand.

It’s important to note that as down to earth and non-flashy as my friend is, he drives a fairly new BMW. While the type of car he drives shouldn’t be a factor in anything, it was in this particular situation because he was a Black man, driving an expensive car in an urban area. Immediately the police officer thought that those three elements couldn’t possibly fit together in a legitimate way, so my friend was followed for several miles and eventually pulled over for no apparent reason, other than DWB (driving while Black).

I bring this story up because some of the same maltreatment and generalizations that have plagued the African-American community for decades, now plague Hispanic communities. Such actions aren’t fair and they go against the basic rights and levels of respect that all Americans should have.

I’m the first person to say that our current immigration system is not only flawed, but also dangerous, particularly when you consider the illegal drug cartels. However, there are ways that the issue can be addressed and ultimately resolved that don’t violate one’s civil liberties.

What has been done in past years, can’t be done anymore: we can no longer procrastinate on such an important issue. It needs to be addressed now.

I find it interesting that Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., seems to think that climate control (as important as it is) should take precedence over immigration. As a matter of fact, he believes immigration reform can be addressed in 2012.

Arizona’s law is scheduled to take effect this summer. The federal government needs to do something drastic to ensure that it doesn’t. If not, every person in Arizona who looks a certain way, has a particular kind of name, or who speaks with an accent will be unfairly stereotyped and targeted.

(Reprinted from the Indianapolis Recorder.)

Last Updated on Monday, 03 December 2012 19:20

Hits: 820

Bill O’Reilly’s obsession with playing race card

(NNPA)—So-called conservatives in this country spend much of their time accusing Black folks of “playing the race card” when practically any comment is made about expressions of White su­pre­m­acy. The leader of the conservative mantra on this subject is Fox “fair and balanced” cable news’ reigning propagandist, Bill O’Reilly.

APeterBailey

On his television program and in his newspaper column, O’Reilly regularly scolds those whom he considers “playing the race card.” In a recent column he pontificated about speaking to a gathering of Al Sharpton’s National Action Network during which he told the attendees that “…branding the Tea Party as a racist group would be a huge mistake that could actually create racism…”

Last Updated on Monday, 03 December 2012 19:20

Hits: 1198

Blacks with guns?

(NNPA)—When the so-called pro-gun demonstrators decided that April 19th would be their day to “march while packing” (weapons), the first thing that I said to my wife was this: “So, what would happen if hundreds of Black folks were to go to a national park fully armed and march?”

BillFletcherbox

I think that there is little doubt but that the subsequent scene would make Custer’s Last Stand look like a squabble. The forces of the police; more than likely the National Guard; and some right wing extremists would all have shown up to prepare for armageddon.

Last Updated on Monday, 03 December 2012 19:20

Hits: 1112

A rising tide lifts all boats

(NNPA)—You’ve heard the saying; it was made famous by John F. Kennedy to suggest that an increase in a particular region’s wealth would enhance the overall wealth of the entire country. Ronald Reagan and his minions came along and used the same aphorism to suggest that an increase in individual wealth, namely through tax cuts, would result in a “Trickling-Down” of prosperity to the poor (Supply-Side Economics). Now we hear the phrase being uttered by President Barack Obama—I wonder what he means by it?
Whatever the intent, original, twisted or revised, there is an overriding truth in the phrase: A rising tide lifts all boats, that is, if you have a boat, it has no holes in it, and it is in the water rather than in dry-dock.
JamesClingmanbox

Last Updated on Monday, 03 December 2012 19:20

Hits: 2431

Subcategories

Trending Topics

Digital Daily Signup

Sign up now for the New Pittsburgh Courier Digital Daily newsletter!

Powered by Real Times Media  © 2009 - 2015 • All rights reserved • Website Developed by ETECH Design Studio

Register

User Registration
or Cancel