Articles

Former GOP congressman blasts Obama, voting and immigration at Tea Party gathering

Category: National Published on Thursday, 11 February 2010 12:14 Written by NNPA News Service

(NNPA)—Former Republican congressman Tom Tancredo made controversial statements about President Obama, voting procedures, and immigration in his kickoff speech at the National Tea Party convention in Nashville, Tenn. on Feb. 4.

Among his statements, Tancredo called for the return of a poll tax, which those wishing to vote must pay. Tancredo also said potential voters should be required to take literacy tests in order to vote.

“People who could not spell the word vote or say it in English put a committed socialist ideologue in the White House,” Tancredo said in his speech. “We do not have a civics [or] literacy test before people can vote in this country.”

Tancredo, a former representative from Colorado, also claimed that there was a “cult of multiculturalism” at work in the country.

He told CBS news that “there is a devotion to a multiculturalist agenda” which he believed could “divide America up into these subgroups.”

Judson Phillips, the Tennessee lawyer who formed Tea Party Nation, agreed with Tancredo’s statements, including his assessment of Obama as a socialist.

“The word ‘socialist’ is a word you don’t want to be labeled with in the American political system. It’s got a lot of negative connotations, but it also has a very specific political meaning. It refers to a specific political ideology,” Phillips told CNN. “I think it is very clear that that is the political ideology of Barack Obama.”

His comments have already drawn the ire of liberals and conservatives alike.

“He’s calling for things that, thank God, were banned and were part of Jim Crow life,” Heidi Beirich, research director at the Southern Poverty Law Center, told the Denver Post. “To me, it’s an incredible thing to say. We’ve been down this road before. It’s not a good history for us to follow.”

Mark Skoda, founder of the Memphis Tea Party, told CNN that Tancredo’s comments don’t “further the dialogue.”