- Trailer Parking: Zoe bares all in Allure magazine pictorial - 2013-05-17
- NAACP head says Orie Sisters’ sentence just; Judge orders re-sentencing for ex-Justice Melvin - 2013-05-10
- Nighthawks reunite for 2013 Pittsburgh Blues Festival at Hartwood Acres - 2013-05-07
- Workforce Investment Board kicks off Career Week - 2013-05-05
- YWCA rally against racism - 2013-05-03
Created on Thursday, 19 November 2009 12:07 Last Updated on Monday, 03 December 2012 19:19 Published on Thursday, 19 November 2009 12:07 Written by Christian Morrow - Courier Staff Writer Hits: 1080
“Every homeowner in the state is just a lawsuit away from a tax increase,” he said. “This is a statewide issue, and Common Pleas judges shouldn’t be dictating assessment policy.”
On Nov. 10, Wettick issued the reassessment plan after not receiving one from the county. It orders that the county be divided into four “districts” and its 575,000 properties be reassessed in rotation.
The first assessment district, which would include school districts and communities where the difference between market values and assessed property values is the greatest, would have to complete its reassessment by Oct. 1, 2010. It would be based on district real estate sales as of June 30, 2009.
The second district would complete its reassessment Oct. 1, 2011, again using sales date from the end of the previous fiscal year, and so on until the final district reassessment is completed Oct. 1, 2013. But while each district would use the new values to set school and municipal tax rates in the year following its reassessment, the county rate would still be based on the 2002 base-year values now in place.
Onorato said Wettick’s plan is unconstitutional because having properties assessed at different rates violates the uniformity clause of state constitution. Ironically, it was the uniformity clause that the Supreme Court used to throw out the county’s base-year system in April. The system set assessments—including new construction—based on 2002 property values.
“The court didn’t say using a base-year is unconstitutional, they said the way we did it was,” Onorato said. “The Supreme Court said this in the purview of the state legislature, which is why I’ve been lobbying in Harrisburg for a moratorium on assessments.”
Onorato called on the Republican-controlled state Senate, particularly the appropriations committee, to vote on moratorium legislation that passed the state House 197-0. He said Republican state Sens. Jane Orie and John Pippy have already voiced their support for the legislation, HB 1661, which would allow two years for the legislature to study other state’s tax policies to develop a statewide system.
“We should have a consistent, unified system like 48 other states do. They don’t have this problem,” he said. “Right now, the only thing standing between homeowners and a massive tax increase is the appropriations committee of the state Senate. They are sitting on their hands, they could vote on this tomorrow.”
Onorato said he doesn’t know how quickly Commonwealth Court will hear the county’s appeal, but said it would be filed within the required 30-day period.
Digital Daily Signup
Sign up now for the New Pittsburgh Courier Digital Daily newsletter!
- Obama's Morehouse visit shines spotlight on HBCUs (1)
- Janet Jackson, Wissam Al Mana Married In Secret Wedding (2)
- Fifth annual National Achievers Society inductions (2)
- Breast cancer survivor group targets young Black women (1)
- Wes Moore replaces Dr. Ben Carson as Johns Hopkins commencement speaker (3)